跳到正文
原文
AdExchanger· <img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2304-120x120.jpg" alt="Photo of Anthony Vargas" width="60" height="60" class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset" loading="lazy"> Anthony Vargas·· 3 小时前AI 评分53

Google Ads 推出无效流量总览卡片,首次明示抵扣金额

Google Will Now Tell You Exactly How Much It’s Crediting You For Invalid Traffic

文章要点
  • 1Google Ads 新增无效流量总览卡片,首次按广告活动展示拦截节省金额与抵扣额度
  • 2无效流量抵扣等于相应广告支出金额,自动作为账单调整减少下期应付金额
  • 3Google 称 AI 增强使 2023 至 2024 年投放给无效流量的广告减少 40%,此为官方口径
  • 4Thales 称自动化流量今年占在线活动 53%,DoubleVerify 称 2024 年末 IVT 同比增长 86%
决策要点

机器人流量造成的广告浪费从此有可见数字,但拦截标准与抵扣口径仍由 Google 单方掌握。

  • 影响:广告主可据此量化无效流量消耗,纳入媒体预算审计与渠道质量对比;第三方验证平台也在做抵扣,双方数字口径可能不一致,采购结算时需明确以谁的数据为准。
  • 参考:可考虑在卡片可用后导出各账户抵扣数据,先算出无效流量占总支出的比例作为审计基线;值得与 DoubleVerify 等第三方验证数据交叉比对,留意口径差异。
  • 依据:功能与抵扣规则均为 Google Ads 官方口径,暂无独立验证;40% 降幅为 Google 自述;53% 与 86% 分别出自 Thales 与 DoubleVerify 研究。
正文

Thursday, November 12th, 2026 – 8:01 am

SHARE:

Digital advertisers have always wondered exactly how much of their ad budgets they’re wasting on bots. Well, now Google will tell them.

Google Ads announced today it’s adding a new feature called the Invalid Traffic Overview Card to its user interface. For the first time, it breaks down the dollar amount a campaign saved from Google’s invalid traffic (IVT) blocking and exactly how much Google is crediting the campaign as a result.

Google’s ad platform has long provided its own IVT-detection tech and credited advertisers for ads served to invalid impressions. This IVT detection always attempts to filter out invalid traffic before the advertiser is billed, a Google spokesperson told AdExchanger. “Or we issue an automatic credit as a billing adjustment on their next invoice when it’s detected later, where appropriate and possible,” they said.

Google’s platform doesn’t just filter out malicious bots as IVT. “Google’s systems analyze all traffic, including agentic activity, to determine if there is genuine interest in a business,” the spokesperson said.

Google aims to filter out any traffic it decides is not serving the advertiser’s business interest before the end of the billing cycle, so there’s no need for a credit, they added. If “ongoing analysis” detects the IVT post-billing cycle, that’s when a credit gets applied.

The credit is equal to the ad spend. “So, if $100 of spend was deemed as invalid traffic and detected after the end of the billing cycle, then a credit is issued for that $100,” the Google spokesperson said. “These credits are applied automatically as a billing adjustment that reduces the amount owed on their next invoice.”

And there are no restrictions on what ad inventory these credits can be applied to, the spokesperson said.

Third-party IVT-detection platforms likewise attempt to credit advertisers for wasted spend, although naturally, Google has direct insight into what’s happening on its platform and can more easily catch IVT before the advertiser gets billed for it.

And Google says recent AI-driven enhancements have improved its IVT detection methods. For example, Google says it saw a 40% reduction in ads served to IVT between 2023 and 2024.

But advertisers have grappled with a lack of transparency into how they’re being compensated for ads that inevitably get served to bots. Google has heard those complaints, hence why it’s rolling out this feature, the spokesperson said.

The timing also makes sense because IVT and bot traffic continues to grow as a share of online activity. Recent research from cybersecurity group Thales found that automated traffic has eclipsed human traffic, accounting for 53% of online activity this year and 51% last year.

And, according to ad verification platform DoubleVerify, the growing popularity of generative AI and a related uptick in AI scraping activity resulted in IVT increasing by 86% year over year in late 2024.

No one wants to serve ads if doing so has no chance of leading to a purchase or conversion. Now advertisers will have a better idea of just how many bots are out there, and how much money they’re saving by not advertising to them.

来源:AdExchanger · adexchanger.com