跳到正文
原文
SaaStr· Jason Lemkin·· 7 小时前AI 评分53

SaaStr 创始人 Jason Lemkin 谈增长放缓时挤压老客户的代价

When Growth Slows, Folks Start Wanting to Do the Crappy Things. Fight It.

文章要点
  • 1作者列举增长放缓后的常见做法,包括提价补预测缺口、砍免费版、强推多年合同、挽留低绩效者等
  • 2作者认为这些做法不创造新客户,只是从存量客户身上提取更多,NRR 可因此好看几个季度
  • 32026 年 B2B 切换成本快速下降,客户每季度评估 AI 原生替代品,有的用智能体和 vibe coding 工具自建替代方案
  • 4作者以 SaaStr 自身为例,遇到突然涨价或强制多年合同会评估更换供应商,且常发现离开成本不高
决策要点

增长放缓时向存量客户挤收入的打法,本质是用多年信任换一两个季度的报表数字,并没有创造任何新客户。

  • 影响:在切换成本下降的环境里,涨价和强制多年合同带来的流失风险比以往更高;客户每季度都在评估 AI 原生替代品,挤压动作反而给了对方尝试替代品的理由;信任损耗不会体现在董事会汇报里,直到失去才可见。
  • 参考:可考虑先盘点自家定价与合同条款中的自动续约、最低席位数、取消窗口等易引发抵触的项目;提价前值得先算出对续约率和新客线索的净影响,而不是只看对本期缺口的填补。
  • 依据:依据为 Jason Lemkin 的观点文章,论据包括其作为买家的亲身体验和 SaaStr 正在评估可替换供应商的做法,属个人判断,暂无独立数据验证。
正文

So when growth slows, the conversations change. Especially from your CRO.

When growth slows, the conversations change. Especially from your CRO.

You start to hear:

  • A ton of talk about raising prices. A lot. There are good reasons to raise prices. You added a lot of value, the market moved, you were underpriced from day one. Missing the plan isn’t one of them. A price increase to cover a forecast gap gets you one good quarter and a base that now trusts you a little less.
  • Pushing to delete low-end and free editions to force users and customers to pay more. The free and low-end tiers are where your next 1,000 customers come from. Kill them and the numbers look fine for a few quarters. Then the top of the funnel dries up and nobody can say why.
  • Forcing customers to buy annual and multi-year contracts. This hides churn, but it only defers it. If smaller customers want to pay monthly and they’re happy, why force them otherwise? A customer locked into a 3-year deal they didn’t want isn’t retained. They’re just stuck, and they’ll tell everyone.
  • Threatening to sue customers over autorenewals, nonpayment, etc. You’re really going to go sue a customer? Over an amount that is a rounding error for you and a real problem for them? Every one of these ends up in a Slack group, a Reddit thread, or a post on X.
  • Hanging on to low performers. Recruiting gets harder when growth slows, so you start to hear a lot of excuses for underperforming management. “The market is tough.” “Give them one more quarter.” The low performers stay, the top performers notice, and the top performers leave first.
  • Moving customer success into sales. Once CS carries a quota, every customer call becomes an upsell call. Then who will actually care about the customers?

Every one of these trades long-term trust for one quarter of numbers

Deals are not lost on price.

If a prospect took 3 or 4 calls with you, it was never what the product costs.

"Don't allow price to be the reason," says Jason Lemkin.

Force any answer other than price or budget. That is how you find the truth. pic.twitter.com/5v81pUQjz8

— SaaStr.ai (@saastr) November 2, 2026

None of it creates a single new customer. All of it extracts more from customers you already have. It’s the same play every time: the new logo engine sputters, so the company turns around and starts mining the base.

And it works, for a little while. NRR can look fine for a few quarters on price increases and forced upgrades alone. But you’re spending down goodwill you spent years building, and goodwill doesn’t show up on a board deck until it’s gone.

In 2026, your customers can leave faster than ever

This matters more now than it did even a year or two ago. Switching costs in B2B are falling fast. Your customers are evaluating AI-native alternatives every quarter. Some of them are building replacements themselves with a few agents and a vibe coding tool. We’re doing that ourselves at SaaStr right now, looking hard at which vendors we can replace when the pricing and contract terms start feeling punitive.

So when a vendor hits us with a surprise price increase, a forced multi-year term, or a new metering scheme, we don’t just grumble and pay anymore. We go look at what it would take to leave. And more and more often, the answer is “not that much.”

If you squeeze your base in this environment, you aren’t just risking churn in 2027. You’re handing your customers the exact reason they needed to go try the alternative.

The founders may be the only ones to fight here.  That energy has to go into winning, into gaining market share, into getting back to growth.  Not into getting more pain out of the base.

It’s gotten so bad, that even I’m a bit scared to buy any traditional SaaS product today.  It’s all too much. I don’t want to sign up for years of this:

Even I’m a bit scared to buy traditional B2B software today

It’s gotten so bad that I’m a bit scared to buy almost any traditional software product today. It’s all too much. The auto-renewal clauses buried on page 11. The 90-day cancellation windows. The “we’re moving you to our new pricing” emails. The minimum seat counts. The rep who suddenly can’t do monthly anymore.

I don’t want to sign up for years of that. And neither do your customers.

The vendors I’m happy to keep paying are the ones who made it easy to start, kept making the product better, and never made me feel trapped. I pay them more every year, and I don’t mind, because I chose to.

Fight for your customers.  Fight for the little guy.  Fight for Free.  Fight for The Future.

来源:SaaStr · saastr.com