跳到正文
原文
TechCrunch · AI· Tim Fernholz·· 6 天前AI 评分64

Anthropic IPO 后谁真正掌权:普通股东被三层结构排除在控制之外

Who’s really in charge at Anthropic after the IPO?

文章要点
  • 1Anthropic 临近 IPO,其多层治理结构将让公开市场普通股东对董事会等重大决策几乎没有话语权。
  • 2长期利益信托 LTBT 可选举和罢免董事会多数席位,成员包括前美联储主席 Ben Bernanke。
  • 3七位创始人合计握有 50.1% 股东投票权,可选出三名董事,控制权在 IPO 十年后或创始人少于三人时终止。
  • 4当 LTBT 提名或罢免其指定董事时,董事会提名委员会可否决并交由全体员工投票决定。
决策要点

Anthropic 的 IPO 不只是融资事件,而是用公益公司身份、LTBT 和创始人特别股把控制权设计在公开市场之外,员工投票成为少数能改变格局的变量。

  • 影响:普通股东十年内对董事人选等重大决策话语权有限;董事会可基于安全使命做不完全以股东价值为依据的决策;创始人内部分裂或员工立场变化可能让实际控制格局偏离设计。
  • 参考:若考虑参与此类 AI 公司 IPO,可先拆解招股文件里的投票权结构,算出普通股的实际话语权;评估模型供应商时值得把治理结构对安全决策优先级的影响纳入考量。
  • 依据:50.1% 创始人投票权、LTBT 可任免多数董事、十年控制期等条款出自本文对 Anthropic 治理结构的媒体梳理,具体条款以招股文件为准。
正文

Anthropic was founded in 2021 to ensure humanity can control AI and benefit from it in the long-term. As the frontier lab approaches its initial public offering, however, there’s one class of humanity that is being shut out of control: anyone who buys its stock on public markets.

Complex structures that allow founders like Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg to control their public companies without owning most of them are nothing new in Silicon Valley. But Anthropic’s obsession with AI safety has resulted in a truly baroque style of corporate governance that will leave common shareholders with little say over most major decisions at the AI company, including who sits on its board.

First, Anthropic is a public benefit company—a for-profit corporation legally allowed to weigh a public mission alongside profit—with the goal of promoting AI safety. That status protects the board’s ability to make decisions about AI safety that aren’t driven entirely by shareholder value without being sued by angry investors.

Right now, the board is chaired by Anthropic president Daniela Amodei and includes CEO Dario Amodei (her brother), Netflix cofounder Reed Hastings, former Microsoft and GM CFO Christopher Liddell, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan, and Spark Capital partner Yasmin Razavi. There is one vacancy on the board.

Second, Anthropic has allocated significant control of its board to a Long Term Benefit Trust (LTBT), an independent panel meant to keep the company focused on mission to benefit humanity. The trust owns a class of stock that gives it the ability to elect and remove a majority of the company’s board, known as Class T directors. The LTBT is chaired by Neil Shah, a global health expert who was managing director at GiveWell, a nonprofit that ranks charities, and includes former Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke, national security expert Richard Fontaine, and Harvard physicist Christopher Stubbs. There is one vacancy on the LTBT right now. The existing members will themselves choose who fills it.

Third, Anthropic’s seven founders also jointly own a special class of stock that gives a majority of them an 50.1% of shareholder voting power, allowing them to elect three members of the board of directors. If, for whatever reason, there’s no majority among the founders, only then are their shares voted in proportion with holders of common stock.

Finally, the board can put a check on the LTBT. When the LTBT nominates a “Specified” one of its four directors, or removes that director without cause (that is, without alleging misconduct), the board’s nominating committee can decline to approve the move and throw the decision to the company’s employees for a vote.

Here’s what all that looks like:

Image Credits:TechCrunch under a Tim Fernholz license.

The dynamics of such a complex structure are hard to predict. We’ve already seen one notable instance where a similar structure was essentially overthrown: OpenAI’s so-called blip, when OpenAI’s board briefly fired CEO Sam Altman over concerns that he was not being candid with them. Thanks to the loyalty of the company’s employees to Altman, the board backed down, reinstated him, and a new governance structure was put in place. Anthropic’s structure seems to formalize that kind of employee power.

At Anthropic, cracks in the founders’ unified front could lead to common shareholders having more say than expected, while employees can overrule the LTBT on board seats if they back the board over the assembled luminaries.

The founders’ control won’t last forever: Ten years after the IPO, the founders can choose to end their control of the company, or their control will end automatically when fewer than three of them remain. At that point, the LTBT will continue until 85% of common shareholders vote to end it, or it decides to step down with approval from the board.

If and when neither special class of shareholder exists any more—hopefully not because of an AI-driven catastrophe—common shareholders finally get control.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Tim Fernholz is a journalist who writes about technology, finance and public policy. He has closely covered the rise of the private space industry and is the author of Rocket Billionaires: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and the New Space Race. Formerly, he was a senior reporter at Quartz, the global business news site, for more than a decade, and began his career as a political reporter in Washington, D.C. You can contact or verify outreach from Tim by emailing [email protected] or via an encrypted message to tim_fernholz.21 on Signal.

View Bio

来源:TechCrunch · AI · techcrunch.com