跳到正文
原文
AdExchanger· <img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/34-120x120.png" alt="Photo of Allison Schiff" width="60" height="60" class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset" loading="lazy"> Allison Schiff·· 3 小时前AI 评分53

TIME 用 Kana 的 AI 智能体分担广告销售协调,交易仍由人类销售完成

TIME’s AI Agents Do The Coordinating, And Its Sellers Still Do The Selling

文章要点
  • 1TIME 用 Kana 的两个 AI 智能体,一个辅助销售读 RFP 起草提案,一个帮广告运营监控投放并建议调整
  • 2此前一份 RFP 需在 Salesforce、Slack 等平台间手动协调数天,TIME COO 称卖方花太多时间当协调员
  • 3销售智能体从 TIME 的 CRM、订单系统和广告服务器拉取知识图谱,还纳入在投数据构思新提案
  • 4TIME COO 称营收运营产出显著增加并已用于 2027 年预算建模,双方暂不让智能体直接谈交易
决策要点

媒体广告销售正把提案协调这类事务性工作交给智能体,人和客户关系保留给销售,TIME 给出了用 AI 提效但不替代人的明确边界。

  • 影响:广告和媒体销售团队可把 RFP 响应、投放监控等事务交给智能体,缩短提案响应周期;销售岗位重心会转向客户关系与新提案构思,纯协调工作的耗时被压缩;智能体之间直接谈交易技术上已可行,买卖双方协作方式存在变化空间。
  • 参考:可考虑盘点销售团队在 RFP 响应中跨平台协调的耗时,评估用智能体打通 CRM、订单系统和广告服务器数据;值得在投放监控这类有仪表盘但缺处置建议的场景先试点,并划清人与智能体的分工边界。
  • 依据:判断基于 TIME COO Howard 与 Kana 创始人 Vaidya 的受访说法,产出提升和 2027 建模均为 TIME 官方口径,暂无独立验证。
正文

If an AI agent can turn an advertiser’s RFP into a proposal in minutes, what’s left for a publisher’s ad sales team to do?

A lot more selling, said Mark Howard, TIME’s chief operating officer.

In the recent past, when an RFP would come in from a potential buyer, it would kick off a flurry of activity – and a series of labor-intensive tasks – that had little to do with actual selling. Once a rep logged the RFP details in Salesforce, the hand-offs would begin.

Alerts would fire off via Slack, product experts would be dragged into Google Meets to map out inventory across a large product suite and notes would get blasted over email. Meanwhile, the sales team would spend days manually coordinating across various platforms to stitch together a response.

“Premium media sales is still a highly personal, relationship-driven business,” Howard said, “and sellers lose too much time playing coordinator.”

TIME well spent

To help ease that operational bottleneck, TIME has been working with Kana, a startup founded by Tom Chavez and Vivek Vaidya, serial ad tech entrepreneurs and the dudes who co-founded Krux, the DMP Salesforce bought roughly a decade ago.

In 2019, the pair launched super{set}, a nontraditional VC firm that co-founds, builds and incubates data and AI startups.

Along with Kana, its portfolio includes privacy platform Ketch; data clean room provider Habu, which LiveRamp bought for $200 million in 2024; and Rembrand, an AI-powered virtual product placement company that agreed to merge with content ad platform Whisper World just last week.

Kana, which came out of stealth in February with a $15 million seed funding round, builds AI agents that take over the grunt work of the ad business.

TIME is using two of Kana’s agents. One works alongside the sales team, reading RFPs and drafting proposals. The other works with ad ops, watching live campaigns and recommending what to do when one starts to fall behind.

The sales agent draws on what Vaidya refers to as a “knowledge graph,” a shared pool of context Kana builds by pulling from TIME’s Salesforce CRM, order management system and ad server, both direct and programmatic.

It also brings in data from live campaigns, which is atypical for a pre-sales tool, Vaidya said. Once a deal closes, this type of data is usually the domain of ad ops, which uses it to look back at how a campaign performed, not to plan the next overture.

The sales agent can proactively turn that information into raw material for pitches.

“We do the research, we look at historical data and we look at similar advertisers,” Vaidya said. “Then a salesperson can go in and start ideating on new proposals for advertisers that TIME hasn’t even sold to yet.”

But the relationship itself still belongs to the salesperson, Howard said, and TIME isn’t looking to automate that or make it into an agentic process.

“We don’t do it with our journalism,” he said, “and we’re not going to do it with our sales.”

Well, at least, “that isn’t the plan for now,” he added.

Ops gets an assist

Once a deal closes, the work shifts to ad ops, and to Kana’s second agent.

Ad ops teams already have dashboards that show them when a campaign is underdelivering or not pacing properly. What those dashboards don’t say, though, is what to do about it, Vaidya said. 

The Kana agent answers that for each campaign and recommends a fix, like changing trafficking, pacing or budget, so a shortfall doesn’t turn into a make-good.

TIME’s revenue operations team, meanwhile, is also using the tool, Howard said, and he’s seen “a significant increase in what they’re able to accomplish in any given day or week.” It’s also helping with budget planning.

“And not just for how we’re going to finish this year and how Q1 looks, but actual 2027 modeling,” Howard said. “It’s a whole new world when you can have these kinds of insights delivered to you.”

Human relationships first

Between proposals and pacing, agents now cover most of a deal’s life cycle, so there’s technically nothing stopping a publisher’s agent from dealing directly with an advertiser’s agent while the sales rep heads out for a three-martini lunch.

Kana could build that, Vaidya said. Put an MCP server (a standard way for AI agents to connect to other software) in front of the proposal agent, and it would be able to talk to an advertiser’s agents tomorrow.

“That’s a technology problem, which is easy to solve,” he said.

But TIME isn’t planning to go there.

Selling is still built on relationships, Howard said, and agents doing the deal is “just not in our game plan.”

来源:AdExchanger · adexchanger.com