跳到正文
原文
The Verge · AI· Justine Calma·· 19 天前AI 评分57

微软发布机器学习工具 PBC,可提升提前 2 至 6 周的天气预报准确率

Microsoft has a new machine learning tool to improve weather forecasts

文章要点
  • 1微软团队在 Nature 发表开源工具 PBC,用机器学习修正现有模型偏差,提升 2 至 6 周预报准确率
  • 2研究者称 PBC 只需 CPU 即可运行,无需超算或 GPU,为资源有限的气象机构提供低成本改进方式
  • 3研究分析显示 PBC 提升 ECMWF 模型 98% 降水和 92% 气温目标准确率,其 AI 预报系统准确率翻倍
  • 4非营利机构 Rhiza Research 与肯尼亚气象部门正测试 PBC,用于 El Niño 雨季前的早期预警
决策要点

PBC 的实质是给现有预报模型做低成本纠偏,而非重造模型,把 AI 预报改进的算力门槛从超算降到了 CPU。

  • 影响:农业与应急救援等依赖中长期预报的场景有望获得更可靠的提前量;工具开源且可在 CPU 上运行,采用成本低;ECMWF 专家提醒从研究思路到业务运行落地仍是难点。
  • 参考:可考虑先盘点业务中依赖提前两周以上天气判断的决策节点,测算 2 至 6 周预报改善对排期和采购的价值;开源后也值得评估用本地数据接入试点。
  • 依据:准确率提升数字来自论文作者自己的分析,属官方口径暂无独立验证;论文发表于 Nature,ECMWF 机器学习负责人认可方向但强调落地挑战。
正文

Old-school physics-based weather forecasting and even new AI models typically become less reliable beyond two weeks, a problem Microsoft claims to have solved using machine learning.

Researchers with the company say they’ve found a new, cost-effective way to make more accurate weather forecasts two to six weeks in advance — allowing farmers and emergency responders to plan ahead with greater certainty. The findings were published today in the journal Nature, and the tool is now open-source software.

Microsoft joins Google, Nvidia, and other companies developing AI tools for weather forecasting. Instead of creating a new standalone weather model, Microsoft’s latest research in this realm uses machine learning to correct bias in existing models. It’s a more accessible way for resource-strapped weather agencies to improve accuracy using AI, the researchers hope.

It’s a more accessible way for resource-strapped weather agencies to improve accuracy using AI

While physics-based modeling is a resource-intensive endeavor running on supercomputers and generative AI depends on powerful GPUs, Microsoft Research New England senior principal researcher Lester Mackey says the new tool can run just on CPUs. “I have a lot of hope both for the increased resource efficiency of weather forecasting and the extended reliability of forecasts, especially for extreme weather,” Mackey tells The Verge.

Physics-based and AI-based models run into similar problems when they start predicting the weather two weeks or more in advance. Traditional models attempt to simulate the complex physics of Earth’s atmosphere, while AI models look for patterns in historical data to make forecasts. In both approaches, models rely on approximations to fill data gaps, whether from regions with sparse weather stations or complex atmospheric phenomena that scientists are still working to understand. The ways in which these models make up for those gaps in data can become a type of systematic bias. The resulting errors compound when making forecasts further ahead in time, making these predictions less precise.

Microsoft calls its method Probabilistic Bias Correction (PBC). The tool uses machine learning to identify systematic bias in a model and make corrections. One example Mackey gives is to correct for changes in climate. Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are heating up the planet, but a weather model might make predictions based on historical records that can bias it toward colder temperatures than the world is actually experiencing today.

The researchers found that PBC improved the accuracy of a leading physics-based weather model by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for 98 percent of precipitation and 92 percent of temperature targets. The machine learning framework also doubled the accuracy of ECMWF’s new AI forecasting system in the study’s analysis. Before the paper was published, the ECMWF had already awarded the authors’ research on PBC in its AI Weather Quest competition.

The new paper on PBC published by researchers at Microsoft, MIT, ECMWF, and other institutions “is a good example of new ideas being developed for the benefit and consideration of the community,” Matthew Chantry, ECMWF’s strategic lead for machine learning, said in an emailed comment to The Verge.

“As always, turning ideas into reality [in] an operational process is a most challenging step,” Chantry added.

The amount of compute and infrastructure needed for weather forecasting has often left technological advances out of reach for many agencies in economically developing countries. The paper’s authors, however, think PBC can be different. “One of the things that’s really exciting to me about models like PBC is how lightweight they are, how easy to train, that scientists without huge pools of resources can work on trying to configure [these] models and make them perform better in specific localities,” says Genevieve Flaspohler, one of the authors of the paper.

Flaspohler worked on PBC as an intern at Microsoft with Mackey, and now she’s the executive director of the nonprofit Rhiza Research, which is working with the Kenya Meteorological Service Authority — with funding from the Gates Foundation — to see whether AI can help get more accurate early warnings out to people. PBC is one of the methods they’re testing ahead of what’s expected to be a more extreme rainy season during a record-breaking El Niño.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Justine Calma

来源:The Verge · AI · theverge.com