《纽约时报》等出版方起诉 Brave 浏览器,指控其 AI 抓取与绕过付费墙
The New York Times sues Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls
- 1《纽约时报》等出版方起诉 Brave 浏览器开发商,指控其未经许可抓取内容训练 AI 并绕过付费墙。
- 2起诉书称 Brave 将抓取网站索引变现,向 Anthropic、Perplexity、Mistral、xAI、Cohere 等多家 AI 公司收费提供实时在线内容。
- 3出版方称 Brave 宣传数百顶级出版商可通过其付费墙拦截功能访问,且从未获得许可或补偿。
- 4NYT 发言人称起诉为追责盗用内容;Brave 等被告暂未回应,Perplexity 高管指诉状含不实信息。
这起诉讼的实质是出版方追责抓取内容的商业变现链,把向 AI 公司转售内容的浏览器索引商也列为被告。
- 影响:依赖第三方索引获取实时内容做训练或检索的 AI 产品可能被连带追责,内容采购需核查授权链路;媒体类企业在付费墙执行和内容授权谈判上的筹码增加;相关内容接口的合规审查成本会上升。
- 参考:可考虑盘点自家 AI 产品训练与检索所用的内容来源清单,要求索引类供应商出示授权证明;内容业务方值得把付费墙保护写入与 AI 平台的授权谈判要点。
- 依据:指控内容均出自起诉书及当事方声明,属原告官方口径,暂无独立验证;法院尚未裁决,Brave 等被告未回应,Perplexity 公开否认。
The New York Times and a group of other publications have filed lawsuits against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, as reported by Reuters.
According to a complaint filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to “real-time online content from the Brave Index.” The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to “respond to specific user queries,” or both. Brave has allegedly provided “stolen copyrighted content” to “many” AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere.
Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser.
“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without
their consent, and has taken other steps that prevent the Publishers from blocking Brave’s access to the Publishers’ websites. Brave has never compensated the Publishers for the unlawful use, copying, and distribution of the Publishers’ copyrighted content.”
“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” Graham James, an NYT spokesperson, says in a statement. “We filed this lawsuit to hold Brave accountable for stealing our content to power its own products and to provide it to some of the most prominent and well resourced generative AI companies in the world.”
Brave, Anthropic, Mistral, SpaceXSI, and Cohere, didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment. “The New York Times is overpaying its attorneys and underpaying its journalists. (Who could’ve easily identified the disinformation in this suit.)” Jesse Dwyer, Perplexity’s chief communications officer, says in a statement to The Verge.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
- Jay Peters
来源:The Verge · AI · theverge.com