跳到正文
原文
TechCrunch · AI· Amanda Silberling·· 3 天前AI 评分44

肯塔基大学员工凭人文主义信仰获宗教豁免,可在工作中拒绝使用 AI

You don’t need to believe in a god to get a religious exemption from using AI at work

文章要点
  • 1肯塔基大学行政人员 David Durman 获宗教豁免,可在工作中不使用 AI
  • 2AHA 称对 AI 与人类尊严的关切可贯穿多种信仰传统,非有神论者同样受职场法律保护
  • 3肯塔基大学称逐案审核便利请求,本案安排不影响其核心职责,随职责演变可能复审
  • 4他受工程师 Erin Maus 先例启发,在同事建议试用 AI 后提前寻求豁免以防未来成为强制
决策要点

AI 使用开始进入职场宗教便利的法律框架,员工可以信仰为由正式拒绝使用 AI,且不限于有神论。

  • 影响:推行 AI 工具时可能收到个别员工的豁免请求,需逐案评估岗位核心职责;非有神论信仰也能主张豁免,请求来源比有神论更宽;大规模强制使用前应先算清法律与团队关系成本。
  • 参考:可考虑在强制推行 AI 前梳理各岗位哪些环节离不开 AI,只对必要环节提要求;值得与法务和 HR 预先商定豁免请求的个案评估流程,参考本案以职责影响为标准。
  • 依据:事实来自 TechCrunch 对 Durman、AHA 律师和肯塔基大学发言人的采访,均为当事方口径,属个案,暂无更大范围的司法或统计验证。
正文

Pope Leo XIV has decried AI as a threat to human dignity, but it’s not just the devoutly faithful who might worry about how AI squares with their beliefs. David Durman, a nontheistic Humanist, recently secured a religious exemption from using AI in the workplace.

“Humanism is a collection of beliefs about the human experience and how humans interact with the world,” Durman, a University of Kentucky administrator, told TechCrunch. It centers on “human well-being and flourishing, both individually and collectively […] and implores a person to try to improve both their well-being and their flourishing as well as the others around them.”

As he watched AI grow more popular in daily life, Durman sought out the American Humanist Association (AHA) — a nonprofit advancing secular humanism — to investigate how he could gain legal protections against having to use AI at work. He believes that using the technology runs counter to his beliefs.

“The way we become moral actors for ourselves and for others is through the active application of our minds, and the diminishing of that [through AI use] is going to necessarily have a negative impact on our ability to do so,” he said, reflecting on how overreliance on AI might affect critical thinking.

In a statement published by the AHA earlier this week, Durman wrote, “AI is interfering with people’s ability to earn a living, the environmental costs spell disaster for humanity and our planet, and its supplanting and theft of human creativity threaten elements of our culture like art and literature that make society flourish.”

Humanism is not anti-religious, but it tends to appeal to people who are skeptical of a god or other supernatural power yet still seek a scientific and moral framework to ground themselves in.

“Concern about AI and human dignity can run through several different faiths and traditions, whether that’s Catholic teachings, or Universalism, or Humanism, and we want Humanists or nontheists to know that they fall into these categories — that they are also protected by the law at work,” Alexandria Huiskens, Staff Attorney at the AHA, told TechCrunch.

Durman is the first Humanist to secure workplace accommodations that allow him to abstain from AI use, and one of the first people to publicly discuss their pursuit of these protections. He was inspired to seek them when he read that Erin Maus, a Unitarian Universalist and software engineer, was able to secure similar protections for herself.

“For me, this was about me and my convictions,” Durman said. “I’m obviously not trying to tell people how to think or feel… But I do hope that it encourages people who have similar concerns to pursue not necessarily religious exemption, but pursue their concerns to the best of their ability where they feel is the most appropriate.”

University of Kentucky spokesperson Jay Blanton told TechCrunch that the institution reviews requests for religious accommodations on an individual basis, considering the employee’s job responsibilities and the circumstances of the request.

“In this case, the university determined that an accommodation could be provided while allowing the employee to continue performing the essential functions of their position,” Blanton said in a statement. “As technology and job responsibilities evolve, accommodations may be reviewed to ensure they remain reasonable and workable.”

Maus’ situation is especially unusual, since it has become rare for software engineers to write code without any AI assistance. But in Durman’s administrative role, in which he supports researchers applying for grants, he has not been required to use AI at work. Like many workers across fields, some of his colleagues and leadership have recommended that employees try out these tools, so he sought to secure his exemption now, in case the suggestion becomes a mandate in the future.

“I hope that if [others] have similar feelings, that they feel encouraged to pursue some kind of resolution,” Durman said.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Amanda Silberling is a senior writer at TechCrunch covering the intersection of technology and culture. She has also written for publications like Polygon, MTV, the Kenyon Review, NPR, and Business Insider. She is the co-host of Wow If True, a podcast about internet culture, with science fiction author Isabel J. Kim. Prior to joining TechCrunch, she worked as a grassroots organizer, museum educator, and film festival coordinator. She holds a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania and served as a Princeton in Asia Fellow in Laos.

You can contact or verify outreach from Amanda by emailing [email protected] or via encrypted message at @amanda.100 on Signal.

View Bio

来源:TechCrunch · AI · techcrunch.com