剑桥大学团队用 Google Co-Scientist 追寻新发传染病背后的分子开关
Finding the molecular switches behind new infectious diseases
- 1剑桥大学 Clare Bryant 用 Co-Scientist 追踪动物传人病原体引发脓毒症等重症的分子开关
- 2Bryant 称,把假设细化到具体氨基酸通常需两到三年实验,其团队有望六个月内完成,前提是靶点正确
- 3工具从其基金申请摘要生成并排序假设,几轮补充数据后从候选蛋白收敛到具体氨基酸
- 4她将未发表数据在工具内保密输入,团队正构建含氨基酸突变的细胞系验证细化后的假设
AI 假设生成工具开始进入真实科研流程,实质是压缩从研究方向到可验证靶点的探索周期,而非替代实验本身。
- 影响:若方向正确,早期假设筛选环节的周期可从两三年压缩到半年,研发排期和预算需按新口径重算;提速数字出自研究者本人,换课题前需评估适用性;未发表数据交外部工具处理时保密边界要先谈清。
- 参考:有研发职能的企业可考虑选一个假设筛选类课题小范围试点此类工具,记录从假设到可验证目标各环节的耗时;值得先与工具方确认未发表数据的保密条款,再决定喂入多少核心数据。
- 依据:从两三年压缩到六个月的提速出自 Bryant 本人说法,并以工具指向正确靶点为前提;案例由 Google DeepMind 官方博客发布,暂无独立验证。
The majority of emerging infectious diseases are caused by pathogens that jump from animals to humans, such as Ebola, HIV, flu and Covid-19. Professor Clare Bryant at the University of Cambridge is using Co-Scientist to hunt for the molecular switches that cause severe diseases, like sepsis, in humans when pathogens leap between species, and find new approaches to prevent this happening.
Testing Co-Scientist, Bryant fed it a summary of one of her grant proposals studying flu in birds and humans outlining her lab’s research questions. The tool generated and ranked a set of promising hypotheses — some she'd already considered, some she hadn't. The unfamiliar ones were the most thought-provoking.
When the grant was funded, Bryant fed in the full, detailed proposal. Later, reading through the output on a train to Brussels, she had an "a-ha!" moment: Co-Scientist had prioritised a protein that hadn’t been on her radar, connected to several signalling pathways she was already interested in. She spent the rest of the week itching to give it more data.
Back at her lab, she added unpublished material, kept confidential within Co-Scientist. With each back-and-forth, the hypotheses sharpened, moving from candidate proteins down to the specific amino acids her lab could focus its experiments on.
Bryant's team is now building cell lines containing the amino acid mutations to test the refined hypotheses. To get to the point of identifying precise amino acids would normally have taken two to three years of experimental work. But her lab is now on track to complete it in six months, she says, if the work with Co-Scientist has led them to the right targets.
来源:Google DeepMind:Blog · deepmind.google